The Primary Directions to Fixed StarsBy Anton Grigoryev
When we open the section on primary directions in William Lilly's Christian Astrology1, we can see directions to fixed stars. If primary directions designated as 'exotics' in modern astrological practice, then
primary directions to fixed stars could be considered to be the 'exotics' of 'exotics'. Nevertheless, primary directions to fixed stars are not unusual in astrological tradition.
The first question in my study of primary directions to fixed stars was what kind of directions are in use in this case?, and especially Regiomontanian tradition of primaries, which is the realm of directions in zodiaco. To solve the problem, I turned to texts of famous Italian astrologer of XVI-XVII centuries Andrea Argolus, whose book Lilly held to be the best for this purpose2. After studying the texts and recalculations of examples, I adhere to the opinion, that it is directions in mundo. Let's consider one example from Argolus. It is the nativity of French cardinal Richelieu3.
Argolus says: The regal stars in principal angles should decree great dignities and most superior power; Regulus truly is in Medium Coeli; and bright South Scale is in East4; Then Argolus gives us two directions: In the year 1622, September 15th [Richelieu] is made the cardinal by Gregorius XVth, as a result of the direction of Medium Coeli to the sextile of Venus, lady of Part of Fortune. Let's consider these directions; first, the direction of Medium Coeli to sextile of Venus. This is the standard direction in zodiaco. Natal Medium Coeli is in 25º07' of Leo. Argolus gives right ascension of Medium Coeli 147º25'. Another direction not to be overlooked, is the Sun directed to South Scale. This direction can be defined as Regiomontanian primary direction in mundo under pole of significator. Using tables of right and oblique ascension from this site, you can calculate primary directions of Ascendant and Medium Coeli to fixed stars. The algorithms of these directions are the same in all systems of primary directions. Let's consider two other examples from Andrea Argolus to show how you can calculate them. And the first example is the direction of Medium Coeli in nativity of cardinal Odoardo Farnese11.
Argolus says: [He] elected cardinal in March of 1591, as result of [the direction of] MC to Spica of Virgo. In this chart Medium Coeli is in 28º01' of Virgo; according to Argolus, right ascension of Medium Coeli is 178º11', and right ascension of Spica is 195º47'. He subtracts right ascension of Medium Coeli from right ascension of Spica, the result is the arc of direction. 195º47' - 178º11' = 17º36'. The arc of direction is 17º36'. Lilly says about direction of Medium Coeli to Spica: Unexpectedly Honour or Preferment is conferred on the Native beyond his hopes or capacity, and many times it affords power of life and death over others; most Astrologians doe hold the mid-heaven directed to the Virgins Spike, to signifie Church preferment;12 Now let's calculate this direction with tables from this site. First, we should go to the page of the table's generator and get the table of right ascension for this chart. We should input 1573 year (the year of the birth) and geographical latitude 43º00' North (geographical latitude of the birthplace)13 in the upper form, then press generate. From the obtained table we get, that right ascension of Medium Coeli (of 28º01' of Virgo or 178º01') is 178º11'. Then we should go back to the generator to generate table of right ascensions of fixed stars. We input birth year (1573) and geographical latitude of the birthplace (43º00' North) in the lower form, and generate the table, whereof we get the right ascension of Spica - 195º40'. Now we subtract right ascension of Medium Coeli from right ascension of Spica to get the arc of direction. 195º40' - 178º11' = 17º29' The arc of direction is 17º29'. Let's consider direction of Ascendant to fixed star in another nativity from Argolus14:
Argolus says: In truth, when Ascendant hits on violent star Heart of Scorpio and the ray of trine of Mars, [he] dies... Ascendant of the chart is 18º52' of Libra; according to Argolus, oblique ascension of Ascendant is 204º21', and oblique ascension of Antares (Heart of Scorpio) is 267º11'. 267º11' - 204º21' = 62º50'. The arc of direction is 62º50'. Now we calculate this direction with the tables from this site. First, we generate the table of oblique ascension to get the oblique ascension of Ascendant. We input year of the birth (1587) and geographical latitude of the birthplace (43º North) in upper form, and generate the table. We find oblique ascension of 18º52' of Libra (198º52') is 204º22'. Then we back to generator, input the year and the latitude in lower form, and generate the table of oblique ascension of fixed stars. The oblique ascension of Antares is 267º28'. We subtract oblique ascension of Ascendant from oblique ascension of Antares to get the arc of direction. 267º28' - 204º22' = 63º06'. The arc of direction is 63º06'. Though Lilly calls Argolus way of directing "generally approved of in all parts of Europe as most rationall" and claims that "we use no method in Directions but Argolus"15, in directions to fixed stars he swerves from Argolus. While Argolus directs to fixed stars in mundo, Lilly proves youself die-hard adherent of directions in zodiaco. He directs to fixed stars in zodiaco without latitude, as we can see in the speculum of primary directions for his example of natal chart16. Lilly doesn't use real positions of fixed stars in the sky for directing, but he directs to their projections on ecliptic. For example, directing the Ascendant to Vega, he uses not oblique ascension of this fixed star, but of its projection on ecliptic17.
Directing Medium Coeli to this fixed star, he uses the right ascension of projection of the fixed star on ecliptic18.
There is a misprint in the table: the right ascension is 280°58' istead of 280°53', but the arc of direction is calculated for the right value of right ascension19. Directing Sun to Spica, he uses oblique descension (because the Sun is in descending part of celestial sphere) of the projection of this star on ecliptic under the pole of the Sun20.
Regiomontanian pole of the Sun according to Lilly is 40°, and oblique descension of 18°33' of Libra (Zodiacal longitude of Spica) under the pole is 190°56'. Lilly doesn't explain, why he directs to fixed stars in zodiaco, though Argolus directs in mundo. We can only surmise his causes. But I dare suppose, that it wasn't because of his so deep devotion to directions in zodiaco. He directs significators to conjunctions and oppositions in mundo, after all. Rather he just didn't want to undertake long and complex trigonometrical calculations of poles, olique ascensions and descensions and so on, he used tables for primary directions. But if we observe Tabulae Primi Mobilis Andreae Argoli, the tables for primary directions Lilly mentioned, we find that they doesn't allow to calculate directions to fixed stars in mundo. Everybody can choose that kind of directions, which he/she likes. As fo me, I prefer to direct to fixed stars in mundo. 2 "The whole Art of Directions is copiously handled by Regiomontanus, Maginus, Leovitius, Manginus, Zobolus, &c. but most exquisitely by Argolus, in his Primum Mobile, unto whom Posterity must acknowledge themselves exceedingly obliged.... At this day we use no method in Directions but Argolus, which is generally approved of in all parts of Europe as most rationall". (Lilly op. cit. page 651) Lilly means Tabulae Primi Mobilis Andreae Argoli, Romae 1610. back to the text 3 Andreae Argoli... De diebus criticis et aegrorum decubitu, Patavij 1652, page 172. I will not discuss here, whether this nativity of Richelieu right or wrong. The natal charts in this book are the results of rectifications, and some charts look questionable, for example, nativity of Charles I (England's) with Ascendant in 14º46' of Libra, or nativity of Henrih II (French) with Ascendant in 3º00' of Gemini. From my point of view, the "rightness" of these charts, and of the Richelieu's nativity particularly, is not so important for my aim. I am going to explain the technique. Nevertheless, the primary directions, which Argolus gives in the nativity of Richeliue, are quite beautiful. back to the text 4 East is the another name for Ascendant, as the same Argolus says: "First house, Horoscope, Ascendant, East or eastern angle signifies native's life..." (Andreae Argoli... Ptolemaeus parvus in genethliacis iunctus arabibus, Lugduni 1659, page 14.) back to the text 5 Modern calculation gives the pole 19º38'. In calculations I used coordinates of the planets and angles from the chart, but modern astronomical knowledge about value of obliquity of ecliptic. Argolus used rounded to degree value of the pole. back to the text 6 Modern calculation gives 165º25'. back to the text 7 Modern calculation gives 222º19'. In calculation I used modern astronomical data about coordinates of the star, about its own movement and precession. back to the text 8 "Nodes of the Moon, Dragon's Head and Tail, violent stars, Antares, Aldebaran, Pollux, Bellatrix, South Scale, Head of Algol or Medusa, and Regulus no less, because of greatest drying, are counted among Anaretas." (Andreae Argoli... De diebus criticis et aegrorum decubitu, Patavij 1652, page 44.) As we can see, there are several regal fixed stars, which could be Anareta. Argolus gives such list of the regal fixed stars: "Regulus, Aldebaran, Antares, Pollux, Spica, South Scale" (Andreae Argoli... Ptolemaeus parvus in genethliacis iunctus arabibus, Lugduni 1659, page 12.) back to the text 9 "...and doth impeach the health of Body, it threatens the Native with a poysonous or very sharp Feaver;" (Lilly op. cit. page 690). back to the text 10 Andreae Argoli... De diebus criticis et aegrorum decubitu, Patavij 1652, page 173. back to the text 11 Ibid., page 168. back to the text 12 Lilly op. cit. page 678-679. back to the text 13 Actually, rigth ascension doesn't depend on geographical latitude, of course. back to the text 14 Andreae Argoli... De diebus criticis et aegrorum decubitu, Patavij 1652, page 236. back to the text 15 Lilly op. cit. page 651. back to the text 16 Lilly op. cit. pages 765-780. back to the text 17 Lilly op. cit. page 765. back to the text 18 Lilly op. cit. page 770. back to the text 19 The right ascension of Medium Coeli of the chart is 222°10'. 222°10' + 58°43' = 280°53'. back to the text 20 Lilly op. cit. page 770. back to the text [ Home ] [ Articles ] |